OJ didn’t do it.
Ten years ago, I undertook a careful study of the OJ Simpson case. It became the backdrop of a novel I wrote at the time in which I solved the murders of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman.
Hardly anyone believed me.
Now “American Crime Stories,” a fairly popular television show is presenting a series about OJ's case. Blurbs about the series say it does not attempt to give full evidence but seeks more to dramatize the dynamics surrounding the case such as police-on-Black violence, spousal abuse, and privilege of the wealthy. Even so, it still must offer evidence or it could not accurately portray the story. I will be looking to see if the evidence is adequately provided or if it is left out or inaccurately offered.
You know I believe he was innocent. You must also know that the book on which the TV series is based, THE RUN OF HIS LIFE, is written by someone who believes OJ is guilty. Jeffery Toobin says as much in the book. Update: He reaffirmed his belief again on March 5 in a NewYorker Magazine essay.
There are three other books that I found to be very helpful in terms of the real facts presented as objectively as possible and one that really unintentionally pointed out how the police went after OJ.
In addition to the Toobin book, Lawrence Schiller’s AMERICAN TRAGEDY, which is told from the perspective of Robert Kardashian, is a must read. The next book that deserves serious regard is KILLING TIME by Donald Freed and Raymond Briggs. The fourth book is MADAM FOREMAN by Amanda Cooley who chaired the jury for their trial deliberations. While Toobin and Schiller started out objective, they both turned against OJ in their updated editions. Freed and Briggs do not commit to a solution to the murders but add new information, give critical data like the autopsies, and raise major questions about the prosecution's timeline of the murders. The Cooley book provides grounds for their “not guilty” verdict as well as an articulate statement about the jury members themselves.
Every other book I read was mostly self-serving. On OJ’s side, the books by Cochran, Shapiro, and Derschowitz were more about their own great careers and less about OJ’s innocence. Marcia Clark, Chris Darden, Fred Goldman, and all the others on the prosecution side did what they could to minimize anything that would have exonerated OJ and chose only to include what would convict him.
The worst was MURDER IN BRENTWOOD by Mark Fuhrman. Yet his book showed some of how the framing of OJ occurred. And Fuhrman didn’t even realize he was doing it!
The worst was MURDER IN BRENTWOOD by Mark Fuhrman. Yet his book showed some of how the framing of OJ occurred. And Fuhrman didn’t even realize he was doing it!
I need to tell you that my work since 1980 as an advocate for ministers in trouble gave me a perspective. I helped with many cases of pastors accused of some nasty stuff and had to sort through everything to come up with a reasonable reconstruction of the actual events, if they even occurred. In those cases, people lied, sometimes the accuser, sometimes the accused, sometimes both, and sometimes the church leaders handling the case.
There are several techniques that I learned to help me identify what were facts and what were misrepresentations in nearly all those cases. One is the development of timelines based on what was said by each person involved or witnessing or handling the matter for the church. That gave me “what they knew and when they knew it.” Comparing timelines opened up each case to where gaps and inconsistencies existed and usually led to lines of investigation that found the crucial facts resolving the case. The book that took that approach was KILLING TIME. As you watch the series, you may want to take notes and put them into chronological order for yourself.
Finally, did the series leave out important information? Did it include things that were not in evidence or proved? As I have the chance over the ten weeks of the series, I will critique each episode and hopefully give you good reason to look again at your opinion about the crime, whether you agree with me or not.
1 comment:
I would also recommend Stephen Singular's book Legacy of Corruption. Singular had a well-placed source in the LAPD who was telling him early on, before the trial began, that key evidence had been planted. Singular was already an established and respected true-crime author when the OJ case occurred. Legacy of Corruption is available in PDF format on Smashwords.com for a low price. It's also sold on Amazon, but it's a lot more expensive there.
Post a Comment