Tuesday, August 28, 2007

"Siesta Dreams" - a poem by Art Davis

With Art's permission, I publish here one of his delightful poems:

"Siesta Dreams"
While on these lazy, hot and humid afternoons I snooze
And once asleep, my Walter Mitty complex courts the Muse.
Solzhenitsyn raves about my poetry; it's so nice!
With Bush, Chirac and Putin crave political advice.
I've urge to storm the lofty citadel of Pulitzer,
Brusquely stopped by surly surrogates suggesting, "Cool it, sir!"
Yes - in my mind, I know, if given chance I'd show 'em,
If they'd allow me to recite for them my latest poem.
Or - team me up with Ginger Rogers. I say, "What a pair!"
Doing intricate routines, so eat your heart out, Fred Astaire!
Or, playing the piano as dear Mother used to do,
Dazzling all at Carnegie Hall, playing "Rhapsody in Blue."
On the operatic stage, I know they'd breathless watch me
And listen to my tear-voiced presentation of Paggliaci. . . .
I'd make them soon forget the one and only Pavotatti
As they listened to my dulcet tone-enraptured "fa-sol-la-ti!"
I would design, as Architect, tall buildings touching star,
Or put to canvas beauty such as found in a Renoir.
Alas, all such pleasant dreams do surely fade away.
The dreams now done, I waken to reality of day.
Arthur H. Davis
8/28/07 (based on a poem of 4/21/93)
Copyright

Mother Theresa

Mother Theresa is probably the most outstanding modern era saint of the Roman Catholic Church. And so it became “news” that a biographer printed letters she wrote to various confessors over her career that point to a “dark ‘life’ of the soul.”

History contains saints who often had the “dark ‘night’ of the soul” experience. John Wesley who founded Methodism, for example, within days after his Aldersgate experience when he felt even his heart strangely warmed and his sins were forgiven, wrote in his journal that he never felt further from God.

Martin Luther had terrible periods of depression. One vignette tells of his being particularly depressed and his wife wanting to do something about it. While he was stewing in his office one day, she scrounged up every piece of black clothing she could find and put it on, completely covering herself. She then went upstairs. When he became aware of the silence of the house, he called for his wife. No answer. That surprised him. And worried him. He called again. This time he heard a sound from upstairs. He ran up to where he thought the sound came from and heard quiet sobbing coming from the bedroom. He burst in the door and found Katherine, his wife, sitting in the middle of the bed, dressed with black dress, black stockings, long black gloves, and heavy black veil, crying into a black kerchief.

“What’s the matter?” he yelled, rushing to her side.

“God is dead!” she cried.

Luther howled with laughter, and that period of depression came to an end.

There are many more such stories of how the inner lives of the saints were tormented. Psychotherapists point to the fact that many suffered from clinical mental illnesses, particularly bi-polar disorder and depression.

These kinds of illnesses often become grounds for removing pastors from ministry even if they have been brought under control by therapy and medication. Thank God the church did not put all its mentally ill on disability but allowed them to struggle through to sainthood. - There are some sociopaths many wish had not been allowed to take positions of authority in the church but that requires a separate treatment.

Since the focus of the letters chosen for the recent book on Mother Theresa were from her descriptions of her darkest times described for her counselors, it is hard to tell if she suffered from debilitating disorders that sometimes overwhelmed Luther and Wesley. We do not see anything of the moments she may have felt otherwise, if those even exist.

From what I gather, given quotes from her letters, I want to offer another view on the reason for her suffering.

There is a pietist movement in Christianity that encourages us to look for assurance, to believe that “He’ll come to you if you ask Him; He’s only a prayer away.”

The more committed one is to that piety, as many monastics tend to be, the more difficult their faith becomes for them if, by chance, they do not feel God’s presence.

The Early Church, as reflected in the New Testament, gives a good deal of attention to the issue. Without going into the nature of the differences among people, those writers offered alternatives to the pietist notion of personal assurance.

Two passages best provide the argument: “By their fruits ye shall know them,” says Matthew 7:16. Matthew 25 says, “If you have done it unto the least of my brethren, you have done it unto me.”

Matthew 25:31-46 describes the final judgment. In this story, all the nations are gathered and the Lord separates them as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. He points out that the “sheep” have served him. Many of them say, “But when did we see you hungry and feed you or thirsty and gave you drink, or a stranger and welcomed you, naked and clothed you, sick or in prison and came unto you?” And the “goats” ask the same question from the other side, “When did we not see you hungry . . . .?

The real power in Mother Theresa’s life was how the poor, “the least of these my brethren,” motivated her to do her ministry.

The fruit of her efforts have certainly been honored by the “World,” most notably by the Nobel Prize. Her work continues even after her death, though her charisma is certainly missed.

Yet she suffered in anguish over the feeling of emptiness and loneliness confessed in her letters, feelings which lasted the larger number of decades of her ministry.

My first impulse when I read of her pain was to offer assurance from these other Bible texts which are not traditionally pietist. I wanted her to know that assurance comes through the eyes of the Christ in the poor she so urgently served, and that not all people can have the sense of Christ’s presence emanating from the great beyond or even from their own hearts.

But to God, Who made us each to receive Him/Her in our own way, it is the good that we do, no matter how it is motivated, that is what finally counts, is what separates the “sheep” from the “goats.”

When I decided to go into the ministry, I remember on two occasions seeking a sense of God’s presence. I was on my knees at a church altar rail in both situations. And nothing happened. I don’t even remember the moment or how it came about that I decided not to worry about it. I was majoring in anthropology at the time. I must have figured out that God wasn’t going to come to me that way. Blessed were those who had that experience, I guess. But more blessed are those who seek to do God’s will without some kind of pay off.

I wish I could have met Mother Theresa, given her a hug she seems to have needed very desperately, and reminded her of Matthew 25.

Sunday, August 26, 2007

Pink's "Dear Mr. President"

My daughter and granddaughter introduced me to Youtube tonight. They showed me two videos, "Muffins," and "Dear Mr. President."

Youtube is where a lot of young people spend their time. My daughter says it motivated a lot of young people to get out and vote in 2006.

Pink's song was not only powerful but appears to be the top of the list of most watched videos on Youtube.

Obama has a chance . . . if the kids actually vote in the primaries.

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

The Frightening New Enemy

Oh my God, we better vote Republican or we will be overrun by Communism . . ., uh no, that's mostly dead.

Um, the Axis of Evil, . . . no that's Bush's line . . . besides North Korea is no longer in it, Iran is many years away from being a credible nuclear threat and Iraq never had the Bomb.

Wait! What's that dynamite phrase John McCain threw out on Sunday on FACE THE NATION? "Transcendant Islamic Jihad!"

That is so 21st century! Like the twentieth century's fascism and communisim, "transcedent Islamic jihad" gives us a mega-enemy vague enough to use to scare everyone and with just enough vivid pictures thanks to the televised beheadings.

Well, for a nation that does not seem to want to be without someone to hate and fight wars against (I mean Gays? Ha! Who can work up going to war against homosexuals because they live next door and the collateral damage would be us).

Now we have a concept that can be pushed by the Republicans that will satisfy the ones who think in black and white terms and who don't like browns either! Collateral damage will be the non-white folks who live overseas. We can just put the ones here in the US into concentration camps as we did the Japanese during World War !! (Gotta keep those young disenfranchized Arabs from Michigan or New York from planting a bomb among us white good folks.)

Sorry if I went over the top there . . . . I am so afraid of how this concept of the "Enemy of the 21st Century" will be used. I lived at the time of the internment camps and know some who lived in them. I was afraid of the Bomb and knew to cover my head and duck under my desk at school. I saw Joe McCarthy in action. I've watched how the fear of Communism led to our slaughter of Vietnamese and Laotians. And this war against the Axis of Evil has led to the death and maiming of too many of our kids and maybe a million Iraqi deaths with two million already spreading into Jordan, Iran, and elsewhere (not the US so much . . . because we won't let them in!) as refugees.

Is there a danger from the Wahabi sect which has schools in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan? Yes. Some graduates from those schools are among the volunteers that are going to Iraq and other places in the Middle East to be the suicide bombers for Al Quaida. I do not think they have infiltrated Hamas, Hezbollah, or the Sunni and Shia insurgents in Iraq but are involved with the Taliban.

The Wahabi (begun in the 1700s) have been especially active for decades. So their influence has grown, particularly in Saudi Arabia. Their mindset, as I understand it, is the most militant. They scare the Sunni nations and are apparently seen as competition among the Shia more than as allies.

This "national security estimate" of mine means to remind us all that there is a danger and that it is complex and has many competing elements in the Islamic world. If we let anyone (particularly Republicans in this day and age) build their political platform on fear of Islamic jihadists and use that the same way we saw 20th century "isms" used, we will repeat the same mistakes and further separate ourselves from the rest of the world.

Thanks to the Bush Administration, and to those Democrats who subscribe to helping international corporations, the military-industrial complex, and Israel have their own way, the threat of long term conflicts with the Islamic world's many factions is very real.

But with a lot of wisdom and a lot of squelching of demagoguery, we may be able to keep the conflicts at the level of policing as it is in Europe and is so far here in the US.

Finally, let me remind everyone that whenever there is a threat, we have to quantify it. How many are there who are real threats? Where are the Wahabi and how strong are they? Do we need to gear up large military forces or can we actually just enhance our law enforcement capabilities? Can we develop competent onsite intelligence, something so dreadfully lacking in the Middle East? Should we be establishing "peace" offensives such as Peace Corps, economic development, water purification and renewable energy that even the Third World poor can afford, etc.?

If the politics of fear of "transcendent Islamic jihad" takes over, it's going to be a very long twenty first century. . . .

Monday, August 20, 2007

The active duty soldiers' op-ed

I just tried to post a comment on THE HORSE'S MOUTH blog in response to the report that the Main Stream Media have given no attention to the recent op-ed piece by active duty soldiers about how the Iraq war is really going, as compared to the wall to wall coverage of the O'Hanlon, et al folks who took the military's trip around Iraq and spoke to those chosen by the military.

Unfortunately, the blog said the comment it let me write was not accepted because the blog was not accepting comments!

So, all glitches aside, let me post my comment here:

All too often, the messengers of unwelcome news are attacked. I am cynical enough to think that the more attention those troops get for their forthright statement, the more likely it is they will be treated the way Uriah the Hittite was treated by King David - put at the front of the battle line . . . .

O'Hanlon et al are home safe. Those boys are still in danger.

If I were a front-running Dem, I'd be on the phones with the news media to pressure them to report the op-ed piece by the soldiers, especially in light of the media's plugging the Bush Administration line so much. But I'd ask they refrain from identifying the soldiers themselves to protect them from retaliation.

Saturday, August 18, 2007

Us and the Mainstream Media

In today's Port Charlotte Sun-Herald, Tim Giago writes of the problem of "spin" and "euphamism." Tim is founder and first president of the Native American Journalism Association .

He criticizes the MSM (Main Stream Media) for accepting the terminology provided by the Bush Administration without pushing behind the words to their actual meaning as compared to what other terms might be more appropriate. The "surge" might better be described as "escalation" and "sectarian violence" is probably really "civil war," though I don't think he is attempting to spin himself.

The strangest example of what he's talking about is the 20,000 "non-surge" troops recently sent into Iraq. "Does this mean the 'non-surge troops' are not in harms way?" he asks.

He is calling on all of us (not just the MSM) to choose the most appropriate word and stick with it, no matter what euphamism is chosen by whatever leader is trying to spin the action being described. He writes, "Please stop being a tool for those who would use words to promote an unjust cause. Get some spine."

All bloggers should take that to heart, myself included. The Administration's setting the word choice means we can be lazy and use their words, knowing what everyone is talking about. But that perpetuates the untruth rather than facilitates full discussion.

Maybe I need a new Thesaurus because it's not easy to find the right words, especially when the Administration provides new spin words every day.

But thanks to Tim Giago for calling us all to the task.

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Interesting precedent

Associated Press reported in this morning's paper that the Bush Administration is seeking to blacklist the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a "terrorist organization." They stopped short of naming Iran as a government to be a terrorist organization.

If they finally decide to name some factions of or all of the Iranian Guard under President Bush's 2001 executive order (AP reports they are still debating it), then other nations could consider pressing for blacklisting CIA black ops groups that kidnap and then conduct extreme rendition, permanent incarceration, and torture of the kidnapped.

Maybe some would look at our occupying forces in Iraq as "terrorist organizations" based on their charging into civilian homes in the middle of the night seeking "insurgents" and "al Quaida" fighters based on skimpy and ineffective intelligence, frequently finding no one but terrorizing the families in the process.

Maybe that's why this Administration has not pushed to go all the way to calling Iran a terrorist organization. That would open the world to the option of naming the United States as a terrorist organization.

Or worse . . . , it would reopen the old argument against the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and their treatment of Palestinians as "state-sponsored terrorism." Heaven forbid that we allow anyone to look upon Israel that way. . . . I mean so what if their home guard (settlers who carry guns and shoot Palestinians on sight) terrorizes Arab workers and students walking past their settlements. So what if huge armored Caterpiller bulldozers crush Palestinian homes, schools, vineyards, olive groves, and businesses because they stand where Israel wants to build its wall or its highway system which chops Palestinian settlements into little pieces.

Maybe we should applaud the President for taking this step to further antagonize the Iranians. This Administration just might set a precedent that frees the rest of the world to do their own blacklisting.

Thursday, August 9, 2007

Where did we learn to torture?

I posted this comment on Digby's site in response to his summarizing Jane Mayer's article in a recent NEW YORKER MAGAZINE:


Several years ago, I researched a novel for the sake of telling the story of the Isreal-Palestine conflict. I became aware the Israelis systematically tortured Palestinians who they arrested as "terrorists."

After reading Sy Hersch's first article on Abu Graib, it became obvious to me that even the tactics used by Sgt. Graner and company were taken out of the Israeli torture playbook which the British identified as "M-12."

Where I got those conclusions, I cannot any longer tell you.

All I can say is that I had the impression that the minute 9/11 happened and this Administration needed a way to interrogate any suspects, I had the feeling they called in Idraeli experts and began to use the same techniques which the Israelis said were effective on Muslims.

This is opinion because I cannot trace back my sources. But I'm sure our torture has been intentionally sophisticated at least since 9/11 and not the result of cruelty by "a few bad apples."

Kudos to New Yorker and its writers for keeping this issue before us.

And God preserve us from the world's wrath, though we do not deserve God's grace, for policies like keeping prisoners incarcerated so they cannot report how they were treated.

Monday, August 6, 2007

OJ is not guilty of murder

For years, I have felt that only a very few bothered to read about the O J Simpson trial and its evidence. I recently responded to a Salon article on sports by King Kaufman in which the writer indicated he disagreed with the trial court innocence verdict on OJ. Having submitted my response, accidently misspelling my first name, I checked the string of responses and discovered Bob in Pacifica who not only believes as I do but bases some of his view on information I had not seen.

I hunted for a way to contact him directly and have not found it yet. I'd sure like to compare notes with him. If you have a way for me to contact him, let me know.

Democratic Congress?

The main stream media has not painted a very clear picture of the accomplishments of this Congress. They had reported extensively on the bills that were vetoed or that the Senate cloture (requiring 60 votes) rules have caused to be submarined, primarily the anti-war legislation.

But how long has it been since Congressional committees called on Administration officials to talk about their actions (and inactions)? How long has it been since "Promote the general welfare" kinds of legislation have been before the Congress, such as Farm Bill, Violence against Women, Global Poverty Bill, Hate Crimes legislation, S-CHIP, legislation overturning "Don't Ask Don't Tell," Congressional Ethics bill, and Worldwide Health Act?

There are aspects of these bills with which bi-partisan support is available. These bills are neither Republican nor Democrat in terms of need for attention. And each party would put its stamp on it . . . except Congresses since the 1990s somehow did little to face up to the issues behind them.

The Democrats in Congress should not be included in the numbers showing that Congress is even less popular than the Bush Presidency. And I'm not real pleased with the progressive bloggers that are too ready to condemn the Dems for obstacles the Republicans throw up in their faces.

Thursday, August 2, 2007

Infrastructure and the future economy

I write the following to my Congressman:

Dear Representative,

The devastating collapse of the I-35W bridge in Minneapolis combined with the bursting of the 80 year old steam pipe in NYC have made a dramatic statement about our presuming our infrastructure could be ignored a little longer. As was pointed out in various commentaires, postponing upgrades to our infrastructure is a calculated risk that community leaders take because they do not want to add to the tax burdens of our citizens.

As others have pointed out, those leaders on local levels have done creative financing to help major league sports venues and, on the national level, have embraced horrendous debt to fight a war in Iraq.

It is time to put that kind of wisdom to work to put our bridges, air ports, etc. back into safe and lasting condition.

Better yet, let's look at a massive federal government intervention including increased taxes as a way to do it.

Yeah, right!

Wait a moment. Think along with me for a minute and see if this highly unlikely scenario is feasible.

First, I think such a taxation would be accepted by the public, especially if the major corporations that benefit from the infrastructure pay a significant share. We'd all pay if the Oil Corporations paid.

Second, construction workers would benefit from the income they get from doing the work. They would pay taxes, spend that income on goods and services stimulating the economy, and provide a product that would be a benefit for years to come (as compared with the spending on military material which tends to end up destroyed). My college econ professor said that every dollar that enters the economy expands seven-fold. If the tax rate averages 15%, then each dollar spent by the government which goes into the workers' hands would pay for itself. - The problem is that there are "money grabbers" that minimize the money going to the workers and maximizes it going to themselves! So any good spending program needs to be monitored to prevent that kind of "Monopoly game playing" to maximize the economic value of the spending.

Third, the public will grew dramatically when that bridge fell down. Congress can keep that motivation going if it eliminates no-bid contracts, maximizes utilization of small local contractors, and meets deadlines for completing the needed upgrades.

Finally, President Roosevelt used public moneys to help our country begin to work its way out of the Depression. It was no small coincidence that the forty year old bridge which collapsed stood a quarter of a mile from a bridge built during the Depression!

Please begin the process of establishing a Congressional plan to deal with the collapsing infrastructure of our nation. Have something ready to go by January, 2008, if not sooner!